(Français) Comment le design intuitif communique-t-il ?

Print version available

Jérôme Guibourgé - Audrey Moutat

MOTS-CLÉS : Intuitive design, Semiotics, Intuitiveness, Factitivity, Inter-objectivity, Usability, Gestural memory, Perceptivo-practical semiosis

This article aims at determining the functional principles of intuitive design, understood as a communication device that tacitly states its usability. The goal will be to show how such a design succeeds in convoking, through object structures, sensible and sensorimotor patterns stored in the memory of the designer and the user. Taking into account both the creative approach of the designer, then freed from all formal constraints and the interpretive practice of a user who seeks to appropriate the object, intuition is thus enunciated by design in order to allow an «immediate knowledge or understanding without the intervention of a rational thought or a logical deduction». Linked to the principle of factitivity, the intuitive design offers a tacit let-know which consists in the recognition of an homologation between the bodily dispositions of a user and the sensitive properties of the objects according to the practical scene they integrate.
From a corpus of photographs of gardening tools we will show that this tacit let-know incorporates a communication process articulated in three levels: (i) Design intuitiveness in a communication device which provides a situational framework of the object; (ii) Intuitiveness of the functions through gestures: the functions of the object that participate in its usability summon user gestures; They may or may not be intuitive; (iii) Materialization of this intuitiveness: design becomes a discourse which syntax makes it possible to regulate the adjustments between the object and the user by reactivating the gestural and practical memory. Identifying these sensory and sensorimotor schemes thus articulated will allow in particular to base the grammar from which the intuitive design can communicate its intuitiveness.

This article is available in the paper version

Buy
on editions-harmattan.fr

Références

Belkhamsa, S. & Darras, B. (2009a). L’objet et le cycle des habitudes et des changements d’habitudes. Approche sémiotique. In B. Darras et S. Belkhamsa. Objets et Communication. MEI 30-31. Paris : L’Harmattan, 147-160

Blandin, B. (2002). La construction du social par les objets Paris : P.U.F

Darras, B. et Belkhamsa, S. & Darras, B. (2009b). Modélisation dynamique de la communication de l’objet. Approche systémique et sémiotique. In B. Darras et S. Belkhamsa. Objets et Communication. MEI 30-31. Paris : L’Harmattan, 161-184

Deni, M. (2005). Les objets factitifs. In J. Fontanille et A. Zinna. Les objets au quotidien. Limoges : Pulim, 79-96

Fontanille, J. (2011). Corps et sens. Paris : P.U.F

Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw et J. Brandsford. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 67-82

Hodgkinson, G. P. (2008). Intuition: A fundamental bridging construct in the behavioural sciences. British Journal of Psychology. 99.1. 1-27

Jencks, C. (1973). Mouvements modernes en architecture. Bruxelles : Pierre Mardaga Jencks, C. (2000). Jencks’s theory of evolution: an overview of twentieth-century architecture. Architectural Review. 208, n° 1241. 76-79

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (2010). L’homme et la matière. Paris : Albin Michel

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (2014a). Le geste et la parole, technique et langage (Vol. 1). Paris : Albin Michel

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (2014b). Le geste et la parole, la mémoire et les rythmes (Vol. 2). Paris : Albin Michel

Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. IX Interactions. VI.3. 38-43

Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York : Basic Books

Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit dimension (éd. Revised). Chicago : University Of Chicago Press.

Rabardel, P. (1995). Les hommes et les technologies. Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Paris : Armand Colin

Sadler-Smith, E. & Shefy, E. (2004). The intuitive executive: Understanding and applying ‘gut feel’. Decision making. Academy of Management Executive. 18 (4). 76-91

Spool, J. M. (2005). What makes a design seem ‘intuitive’? En ligne. https://articles.uie.com/design_intuitiv
e/

Zinna, A. (2005). L’objet et ses interfaces. In J. Fontanille et A. Zinna. Les objets au quotidien. Limoges : Pulim, 161-192

Jérôme Guibourgé - Audrey Moutat

Consultant, Enseignant à l’Ecole de Design de Nantes, Chercheur associé CeReS, Université de Limoges, jerome.guibourge@sensetdesign.fr
Enseignant chercheur CeReS, Université de Limoges, audrey.moutat@yahoo.fr

Previous article

« (Français) Les enjeux théoriques et pratiques de la sémiotique du design »
François Maréchal
Back to the summary